Fix the project code style, as it is not consistent. (#236)

Fixes #202
This PR fixes code style for the project files.

The Problem
Different files in the project use different code style. That is not consistent and leads to harder maintenance of the project.

Description of the changes:
Have investigated and determined the most used code style across the given codebase
Have configured IDE and applied code style to all project files.
Have crafted clang-formatter config.
see https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormat.html
https://clang.llvm.org/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.html
Some cases were fixed manually
How changes were validated:
manual/ad-hoc testing, automated testing

All tests pass as before because these are only code style changes.
Additional
Please review, and let me know if I have any mistake in the code style. In case of any mistake, I will change the configuration and re-apply it to the project.
This commit is contained in:
Oleg Abrazhaev 2019-05-02 20:59:19 +02:00 committed by Daniel Belcher
parent c77f1de84c
commit 2826d37056
237 changed files with 12824 additions and 11843 deletions

View file

@ -15,10 +15,7 @@ using namespace Windows::Foundation;
using namespace Windows::System;
using namespace Windows::ApplicationModel::DataTransfer;
String^ CopyPasteManager::supportedFormats[] =
{
StandardDataFormats::Text
};
String ^ CopyPasteManager::supportedFormats[] = { StandardDataFormats::Text };
static constexpr wstring_view c_validCharacterSet{ L"0123456789()+-*/.abcdefABCDEF" };
@ -40,43 +37,26 @@ static const wstring c_binProgrammerChars = L"[0-1]+((_|'|`)[0-1]+)*";
static const wstring c_uIntSuffixes = L"[uU]?[lL]{0,2}";
// RegEx Patterns used by various modes
static const array<wregex, 1> standardModePatterns =
{
wregex(c_wspc + c_signedDecFloat + c_wspc)
};
static const array<wregex, 2> scientificModePatterns =
{
wregex(L"(" + c_wspc + L"[-+]?)|(" + c_wspcLParenSigned + L")" + c_signedDecFloat + c_wspcRParens),
wregex(L"(" + c_wspc + L"[-+]?)|(" + c_wspcLParenSigned + L")" + c_signedDecFloat + L"[e]([+]|[-])+\\d+" + c_wspcRParens)
};
static const array<array<wregex, 5>, 4> programmerModePatterns =
{ {
// Hex numbers like 5F, 4A0C, 0xa9, 0xFFull, 47CDh
{
wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[xX])?" + c_hexProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens),
wregex(c_wspcLParens + c_hexProgrammerChars + L"[hH]?" + c_wspcRParens)
},
// Decimal numbers like -145, 145, 0n145, 123ull etc
{
wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"[-+]?" + c_decProgrammerChars + L"[lL]{0,2}" +c_wspcRParens),
wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[nN])?" + c_decProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens)
},
// Octal numbers like 06, 010, 0t77, 0o77, 077ull etc
{
wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[otOT])?" + c_octProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens)
},
// Binary numbers like 011010110, 0010110, 10101001, 1001b, 0b1001, 0y1001, 0b1001ull
{
wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[byBY])?" + c_binProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens),
wregex(c_wspcLParens + c_binProgrammerChars + L"[bB]?" + c_wspcRParens)
}
} };
static const array<wregex, 1> unitConverterPatterns =
{
wregex(c_wspc + L"[-+]?\\d*[.]?\\d*" + c_wspc)
static const array<wregex, 1> standardModePatterns = { wregex(c_wspc + c_signedDecFloat + c_wspc) };
static const array<wregex, 2> scientificModePatterns = { wregex(L"(" + c_wspc + L"[-+]?)|(" + c_wspcLParenSigned + L")" + c_signedDecFloat + c_wspcRParens),
wregex(L"(" + c_wspc + L"[-+]?)|(" + c_wspcLParenSigned + L")" + c_signedDecFloat
+ L"[e]([+]|[-])+\\d+" + c_wspcRParens) };
static const array<array<wregex, 5>, 4> programmerModePatterns = {
{ // Hex numbers like 5F, 4A0C, 0xa9, 0xFFull, 47CDh
{ wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[xX])?" + c_hexProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens),
wregex(c_wspcLParens + c_hexProgrammerChars + L"[hH]?" + c_wspcRParens) },
// Decimal numbers like -145, 145, 0n145, 123ull etc
{ wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"[-+]?" + c_decProgrammerChars + L"[lL]{0,2}" + c_wspcRParens),
wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[nN])?" + c_decProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens) },
// Octal numbers like 06, 010, 0t77, 0o77, 077ull etc
{ wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[otOT])?" + c_octProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens) },
// Binary numbers like 011010110, 0010110, 10101001, 1001b, 0b1001, 0y1001, 0b1001ull
{ wregex(c_wspcLParens + L"(0[byBY])?" + c_binProgrammerChars + c_uIntSuffixes + c_wspcRParens),
wregex(c_wspcLParens + c_binProgrammerChars + L"[bB]?" + c_wspcRParens) } }
};
static const array<wregex, 1> unitConverterPatterns = { wregex(c_wspc + L"[-+]?\\d*[.]?\\d*" + c_wspc) };
void CopyPasteManager::CopyToClipboard(String^ stringToCopy)
void CopyPasteManager::CopyToClipboard(String ^ stringToCopy)
{
// Copy the string to the clipboard
auto dataPackage = ref new DataPackage();
@ -84,7 +64,7 @@ void CopyPasteManager::CopyToClipboard(String^ stringToCopy)
Clipboard::SetContent(dataPackage);
}
task<String^> CopyPasteManager::GetStringToPaste(ViewMode mode, CategoryGroupType modeType, int programmerNumberBase, int bitLengthType)
task<String ^> CopyPasteManager::GetStringToPaste(ViewMode mode, CategoryGroupType modeType, int programmerNumberBase, int bitLengthType)
{
// Retrieve the text in the clipboard
auto dataPackageView = Clipboard::GetContent();
@ -95,11 +75,9 @@ task<String^> CopyPasteManager::GetStringToPaste(ViewMode mode, CategoryGroupTyp
//-- add support to allow pasting for expressions like 1.3e12(as of now we allow 1.3e+12)
return create_task((dataPackageView->GetTextAsync(::StandardDataFormats::Text)))
.then([mode, modeType, programmerNumberBase, bitLengthType](String^ pastedText)
{
return ValidatePasteExpression(pastedText, mode, modeType, programmerNumberBase, bitLengthType);
}
, task_continuation_context::use_arbitrary());
.then([mode, modeType, programmerNumberBase,
bitLengthType](String ^ pastedText) { return ValidatePasteExpression(pastedText, mode, modeType, programmerNumberBase, bitLengthType); },
task_continuation_context::use_arbitrary());
}
int CopyPasteManager::ClipboardTextFormat()
@ -116,14 +94,14 @@ int CopyPasteManager::ClipboardTextFormat()
return -1;
}
String^ CopyPasteManager::ValidatePasteExpression(String^ pastedText, ViewMode mode, int programmerNumberBase, int bitLengthType)
String ^ CopyPasteManager::ValidatePasteExpression(String ^ pastedText, ViewMode mode, int programmerNumberBase, int bitLengthType)
{
return CopyPasteManager::ValidatePasteExpression(pastedText, mode, NavCategory::GetGroupType(mode), programmerNumberBase, bitLengthType);
}
// return "NoOp" if pastedText is invalid else return pastedText
String^ CopyPasteManager::ValidatePasteExpression(String^ pastedText, ViewMode mode, CategoryGroupType modeType, int programmerNumberBase, int bitLengthType)
String ^ CopyPasteManager::ValidatePasteExpression(String ^ pastedText, ViewMode mode, CategoryGroupType modeType, int programmerNumberBase, int bitLengthType)
{
if (pastedText->Length() > MaxPasteableLength)
{
@ -135,7 +113,7 @@ String^ CopyPasteManager::ValidatePasteExpression(String^ pastedText, ViewMode m
wstring pasteExpression = pastedText->Data();
// Get english translated expression
String^ englishString = LocalizationSettings::GetInstance().GetEnglishValueFromLocalizedDigits(pasteExpression);
String ^ englishString = LocalizationSettings::GetInstance().GetEnglishValueFromLocalizedDigits(pasteExpression);
// Removing the spaces, comma separator from the pasteExpression to allow pasting of expressions like 1 + 2+1,333
pasteExpression = RemoveUnwantedCharsFromWstring(englishString->Data());
@ -223,7 +201,8 @@ vector<wstring> CopyPasteManager::ExtractOperands(const wstring& pasteExpression
if ((pasteExpression.at(i) == L'+') || (pasteExpression.at(i) == L'-'))
{
// don't break the expression into operands if the encountered character corresponds to sign command(+-)
if (isPreviousOpenParen || startOfExpression || isPreviousOperator || ((mode != ViewMode::Programmer) && !((i != 0) && (pasteExpression.at(i - 1) != L'e'))))
if (isPreviousOpenParen || startOfExpression || isPreviousOperator
|| ((mode != ViewMode::Programmer) && !((i != 0) && (pasteExpression.at(i - 1) != L'e'))))
{
isPreviousOperator = false;
continue;
@ -267,7 +246,7 @@ bool CopyPasteManager::ExpressionRegExMatch(vector<wstring> operands, ViewMode m
}
vector<wregex> patterns{};
if (mode == ViewMode::Standard)
{
patterns.assign(standardModePatterns.begin(), standardModePatterns.end());
@ -339,7 +318,7 @@ pair<size_t, uint64_t> CopyPasteManager::GetMaxOperandLengthAndValue(ViewMode mo
{
constexpr size_t defaultMaxOperandLength = 0;
constexpr uint64_t defaultMaxValue = 0;
if (mode == ViewMode::Standard)
{
return make_pair(MaxStandardOperandLength, defaultMaxValue);
@ -452,26 +431,28 @@ bool CopyPasteManager::TryOperandToULL(const wstring& operand, int numberBase, u
}
size_t CopyPasteManager::OperandLength(const wstring& operand, ViewMode mode, CategoryGroupType modeType, int programmerNumberBase)
{
if (modeType == CategoryGroupType::Converter) {
{
if (modeType == CategoryGroupType::Converter)
{
return operand.length();
}
switch(mode) {
case ViewMode::Standard:
case ViewMode::Scientific:
return StandardScientificOperandLength(operand);
switch (mode)
{
case ViewMode::Standard:
case ViewMode::Scientific:
return StandardScientificOperandLength(operand);
case ViewMode::Programmer:
return ProgrammerOperandLength(operand, programmerNumberBase);
case ViewMode::Programmer:
return ProgrammerOperandLength(operand, programmerNumberBase);
default:
return 0;
default:
return 0;
}
}
size_t CopyPasteManager::StandardScientificOperandLength(const wstring& operand)
{
{
const bool hasDecimal = operand.find('.') != wstring::npos;
if (hasDecimal)
@ -494,7 +475,6 @@ size_t CopyPasteManager::StandardScientificOperandLength(const wstring& operand)
size_t CopyPasteManager::ProgrammerOperandLength(const wstring& operand, int numberBase)
{
vector<wstring> prefixes{};
vector<wstring> suffixes{};
switch (numberBase)
@ -515,7 +495,7 @@ size_t CopyPasteManager::ProgrammerOperandLength(const wstring& operand, int num
break;
default:
// No defined prefixes/suffixes
return 0;
return 0;
}
// UInt suffixes are common across all modes