mirror of
https://github.com/ZeroTier/ZeroTierOne
synced 2025-07-11 07:36:38 -07:00
(1) Get rid of path sorting and just scan them, since sorting may have been a premature optimization that introduced a regression and path instability in a few edge cases, and (2) do not attempt to contact remote paths received via PUSH_DIRECT_PATH if we already have that path and it is already active (dumb, should have done this originally)
This commit is contained in:
parent
3137f43da9
commit
2160164e8c
4 changed files with 60 additions and 72 deletions
|
@ -47,6 +47,11 @@
|
|||
*/
|
||||
#define ZT_PATH_FLAG_CLUSTER_SUBOPTIMAL 0x0001
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Maximum return value of preferenceRank()
|
||||
*/
|
||||
#define ZT_PATH_MAX_PREFERENCE_RANK ((ZT_INETADDRESS_MAX_SCOPE << 1) | 1)
|
||||
|
||||
namespace ZeroTier {
|
||||
|
||||
class RuntimeEnvironment;
|
||||
|
@ -149,9 +154,9 @@ public:
|
|||
inline InetAddress::IpScope ipScope() const throw() { return _ipScope; }
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return Preference rank, higher == better
|
||||
* @return Preference rank, higher == better (will be less than 255)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline int preferenceRank() const throw()
|
||||
inline unsigned int preferenceRank() const throw()
|
||||
{
|
||||
// First, since the scope enum values in InetAddress.hpp are in order of
|
||||
// use preference rank, we take that. Then we multiple by two, yielding
|
||||
|
@ -159,7 +164,20 @@ public:
|
|||
// makes IPv6 addresses of a given scope outrank IPv4 addresses of the
|
||||
// same scope -- e.g. 1 outranks 0. This makes us prefer IPv6, but not
|
||||
// if the address scope/class is of a fundamentally lower rank.
|
||||
return ( ((int)_ipScope * 2) + ((_addr.ss_family == AF_INET6) ? 1 : 0) );
|
||||
return ( ((unsigned int)_ipScope << 1) | (unsigned int)(_addr.ss_family == AF_INET6) );
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* @return This path's overall score (higher == better)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
inline uint64_t score() const throw()
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* We compute the score based on the "freshness" of the path (when we last
|
||||
* received something) scaled/corrected by the preference rank within the
|
||||
* ping keepalive window. That way higher ranking paths are preferred but
|
||||
* not to the point of overriding timeouts and choosing potentially dead
|
||||
* paths. */
|
||||
return (_lastReceived + (preferenceRank() * (ZT_PEER_DIRECT_PING_DELAY / ZT_PATH_MAX_PREFERENCE_RANK)));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue