detectST has better clock detection. Since 'data raw am' fails but 'data detect a' succeed in finding a clock. Lets see if anything else breaks because of this?

This commit is contained in:
iceman1001 2019-03-19 10:20:10 +01:00
commit ab226c2864

View file

@ -458,7 +458,7 @@ int ASKDemod_ext(const char *Cmd, bool verbose, bool emSearch, uint8_t askType,
uint8_t bits[MAX_GRAPH_TRACE_LEN] = {0};
sscanf(Cmd, "%i %i %i %i %c", &clk, &invert, &maxErr, &maxLen, &amp);
if (!maxLen) maxLen = BIGBUF_SIZE;
if (invert != 0 && invert != 1) {
@ -485,14 +485,13 @@ int ASKDemod_ext(const char *Cmd, bool verbose, bool emSearch, uint8_t askType,
if (amp == 'a')
askAmp(bits, BitLen);
bool st = false;
size_t ststart = 0, stend = 0;
if (*stCheck)
st = DetectST(bits, &BitLen, &foundclk, &ststart, &stend);
// if (*stCheck)
bool st = DetectST(bits, &BitLen, &foundclk, &ststart, &stend);
clk = (clk == 0) ? foundclk : clk;
if (st) {
*stCheck = st;
clk = (clk == 0) ? foundclk : clk;
CursorCPos = ststart;
CursorDPos = stend;
if (verbose)
@ -1607,8 +1606,7 @@ int CmdLoad(const char *Cmd) {
break;
}
if (f)
fclose(f);
fclose(f);
PrintAndLogEx(SUCCESS, "loaded %d samples", GraphTraceLen);