github/RRG-Proxmark3
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/RfidResearchGroup/proxmark3.git synced 2025-08-21 13:53:55 -07:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions

Fix SimulateIso14443aInit usage

Browse source 
Added NULL as `uint8_t *iRats` to all invokations in armsrc/Standalone.

Not sure if that is the right thing to do: The actual code checks for the presence of a special flag, but does not contain a check for NULL.
IMHO adding a NULL check in `iso14443a.c` line 1259 wouldn't hurt, and could catch programming errors (flag set by accident, but NULL passed).

Maybe @evildaemond wants to verify whether my fix does the right thing or if I missed something (they added the iRATs to `iso14443a.h` with 56324b16b2).
This commit is contained in:
Sebastian Meyer-Bohr 2024-10-07 11:44:27 +02:00
commit 6da624c580
5 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
armsrc/Standalone/hf_reblay.c
View file

@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ void RunMod() {
BigBuf_free_keep_EM();
// 4 = ISO/IEC 14443-4 - javacard (JCOP)
if (SimulateIso14443aInit(4, flags, data, &responses, &cuid, NULL, NULL, NULL) == false) {
if (SimulateIso14443aInit(4, flags, data, NULL, &responses, &cuid, NULL, NULL, NULL) == false) {
BigBuf_free_keep_EM();
reply_ng(CMD_HF_MIFARE_SIMULATE, PM3_EINIT, NULL, 0);
DbpString(_RED_("Error initializing the emulation process!"));